How learning really happens: unlocking the power of cognitive science in the classroom

Six findings from cognitive science that every teacher should know, drawn from Carl Hendrick’s webinar on how pupils learn and forget, with a free one-page summary to keep by your desk.

Jigsaw pieces printed with words and pictures scattered on a wooden floor

What if we could teach more effectively by understanding how learning truly works? That was the guiding question behind a recent McGraw Hill webinar led by Dr Carl Hendrick, a teacher, researcher, and co-author of How Learning Happens. His talk, The Science of Learning meets Direct Instruction, offered a rich, practical distillation of decades of research into how pupils learn, and, just as crucially, how they forget.

Hendrick walked us through six foundational insights from cognitive science that all teachers should know:

  • Working memory doesn’t work very well: Our cognitive “workspace” is startlingly limited, just 4–7 items at once. Effective teaching must avoid overloading it.
  • Retrieval is learning: Regularly recalling information strengthens memory far more than simply re-reading or highlighting.
  • Memory is reconstructive: We don’t replay memories, we rebuild them each time. Long-term memory is the true engine of understanding.
  • Knowledge enables thinking: Creativity and critical thinking rest on a bedrock of domain-specific knowledge. You can’t connect dots you don’t have.
  • Success drives motivation: Rather than waiting for motivation to ignite achievement, structured teaching builds early success, which in turn fosters motivation.
  • Learning isn’t performance: Just because a student gets it today doesn’t mean they’ll remember it tomorrow. Durable learning requires spacing, retrieval, and desirable difficulty.

Azimuth poster, how learning really happens, after Dr Carl Hendrick. Six principles: working memory doesn't work very well; retrieval is learning; memory is reconstructive; knowledge underpins critical thinking; achievement drives motivation; learning is not performance. Key takeaway: effective teaching is an expert response, not painting by numbers.

Download this resource as PDF

In championing structured, explicit teaching, Hendrick made a compelling case, not just for better test results, but for greater equity. When well-sequenced, knowledge-rich instruction is paired with responsive checking for understanding, students of all backgrounds are more likely to experience success.

This was more than a talk about methods; it was a rallying call to bring evidence-informed practice to the chalkface. As Hendrick reminded us, great teaching isn’t mechanical. It’s responsive, passionate, and deeply human, but it should also be illuminated by what we now know about how learning happens.

We have a science of learning. Do we have a science of teaching?

Dr Carl Hendrick

Photo by Karola G

I help schools with this. See Professional development.

Share this article

The Compass, once a month.

One article on leadership, learning and digital strategy, straight to your inbox. Free, and easy to leave.

Or follow me on LinkedIn.

Comments

Loading comments…

Beyond the Device: prompts to guide a digital strategy that puts learning firstRead the article